A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Punishment of the crime

On August 22, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment and three years of suspended execution as a crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (such as issuance of false tax invoices) in the Changwon District Court's Jeju District Court's branch branch on August 22, 2017. The judgment became final and conclusive on February 28,

1. The Defendant committed a crime against the victim C on November 2014, 2014, in the “E” operated by the victim C in the Southern Sea-gun, Gyeongnam-gun, which is operated by the victim C, the Defendant “Neg. Sar and Sark, Ignish liquor tax.”

It will be supplied to the Customer upon the delivery of the defeat, and the payment will be made immediately after the following day.

“The purpose of “ was to make a false statement.”

However, even if the defendant received a delivery from the injured party and sold it, he was the intent to use the price for the personal purpose of the defendant, and there was no intention or ability to pay the price for the defeat to the injured party.

As above, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; (b) provided the victim with the abortion amounting to KRW 217,000 at the market price around November 14, 2014; and (c) obtained the price from the victim to November 23, 201 of the same year, and acquired it by deception in a manner that does not pay the price.

2. On October 30, 2017, the Defendant sent text messages to G, who is the spouse of the victim F, using cell phoness from the luxal area around October 30, 2017 to the victim F.

When sending two copies of light language 800g, 1kg to 1.2kg, 2kg, and one copy, the sale shall be made and the payment shall be forwarded immediately.

“The purpose of “ was to make a false statement.”

However, even if the Defendant sold the optical language supplied by the injured party, the Defendant had the intent to use it for the personal purpose of the Defendant, and there was no intention or ability to pay the optical language to the injured party.

Defendant deceptioned the victim as above and obtained light language equivalent to KRW 25,950,000 in total market price around October 31, 2017 from the damaged party, and acquired the victim by deception by means of not paying the price.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the defendant;