logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.08.31 2016고정1674
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of nine million won.

Where a defendant fails to pay a fine, one hundred thousand won shall be the day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around 17:00 on August 29, 2015, the Defendant purchased 2,765,000 won of rice from the victim I at the “H” office operated by the Defendant in Busan Dong-gu, Busan, and on September 1, 2015, purchased 8,320,000 won of rice from additional victims around 14:0 on September 1, 2015.

However, since April 2015, the Defendant was faced with economic difficulties, such as designating a recipient of basic living as a recipient of basic living. Even if the Defendant purchased rice from the injured party, the Defendant did not secure the source of selling the rice. Even if the Defendant received rice value, the Defendant had to use the said money in repaying obligations owed by the Defendant. Hence, even if the Defendant purchased rice from the injured party, there was no intent or ability to pay the rice value to the injured party.

Nevertheless, as if the defendant would normally pay the rice value, the defendant deceivings the victim and then acquired rice equivalent to the total amount of KRW 11,085,000 from the victim and acquired it by fraud.

On October 9, 2015, the Defendant called “H” office operated by the Defendant in Busan Dong-gu, Busan, the Defendant called “H” office and supplied the victim J with 48 horses for food supply and delivery of 48 horses in order to operate H-related agricultural products.” The price is paid in cash immediately upon delivery.

However, in fact, even if there was no idea of continuous operation of agricultural products suppliers due to lack of business funds at the time, and if the agricultural products were supplied from the damaged persons and sold them, the Defendant had to use the funds for the repayment of obligations that had been already borne by the Defendant, such as the payment of personal card prices, and there was no intention or ability to pay the funds even if he purchased edible milk from

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as if he would normally pay the price for food, and such deceivings the victim the sum of the market price of KRW 2,208,00 from the victim, and 48 of the edible milk.

arrow