1. The defendant

(a) Attached Form 1, 2, 3, 4.2, 4.

In full view of the fact that there is no dispute, and the purport of the entire argument in each statement of evidence Nos. 1-3, the Plaintiff’s 107 square meters (attached Form Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1) on April 30, 2014, among the real estate listed in the attached list owned by the Plaintiff, connected each point of 10.050 square meters (hereinafter “instant commercial building”).

[) From April 30, 2014 to April 30, 2017, the Defendant leased the lease deposit amounting to KRW 2 million, monthly rent of KRW 100,000 (excluding value-added tax) (hereinafter “instant lease”) to the Defendant (hereinafter “instant lease”), and the Defendant’s failure to pay the monthly rent from August 2014 to April 30, 201.

According to the above facts of recognition, the lease of this case was lawfully terminated by the delivery of the complaint of this case containing two or more rentals of the defendant and the plaintiff's expression of termination.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to deliver the instant commercial building to the plaintiff, and the defendant is obligated to pay the amount of unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent or rent at the rate of KRW 110,000 per month from August 31, 2014 to the completion date of the delivery of the said commercial building.

Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case is accepted on the ground of the reasons.