1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) Of the real estate listed in the separate sheet, the Attached Map 1, 2, 3, 4 and 1.

1. On November 30, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”) with the Defendant on a deposit of KRW 4.5 million and KRW 450,000,000 per month on a ship, which successively connects each point of (i) 1, 2, 3, 4, 1, and 1,50 square meters on the attached list among the real estate listed in the attached list on the said land, which is the owner of Goyang-gu, Gyeyang-gu, Yangyang-gu. The Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”).

As of August 29, 2016, the Defendant paid 3.6 million won, which is the rent of eight months.

On August 29, 2016, the Plaintiff expressed his/her intent to terminate the lease contract to the Defendant on the grounds of the termination of the term of the instant lease agreement, the delayed rent, etc.

【Ground for Recognition: Each entry of Evidence A 1 to 4】

2. According to the above findings of determination, the instant lease agreement was terminated, and the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the amount equivalent to 450,000 won per month from September 1, 2016, which was sought by the Plaintiff from September 1, 2016 to the date of complete payment, the amount equivalent to 150,000 won per annum from September 1, 2016, which was sought by the Plaintiff, among the real estate listed in the attached list, the amount equivalent to 1.50,000 won per month from September 1, 2016 to the date of delivery.

As to this, the defendant, from April 15, 2016, concluded a lease contract at a different place, used the lease contract without returning the lease deposit, and claimed that it did not actually use it. However, the defendant's possession of the leased object of this case by having a vinyl, etc. on the leased object of this case, so the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. According to the conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable.