A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, the fact that the official document was cited and the forged official document was used.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, in collusion with “C”, entered the name of the Defendant into E, the owner of the above land, in collusion with “C” that there is no other personal information, other than the owner’s name and address, on the certified copy of the register of “4,611 square meters of land D, Kimpo-si”, and tried to sell the above land to another person and acquire the purchase price.

On October 6, 2015, the Defendant conspired with “C” to change his name into E, the owner of the above land, and presented the identification card, etc. issued to F’s certified judicial scrivener office located in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Jungcheon-gu, by G, the name of which was opened, and subsequently, decided to trade the above land to the victim H in an amount equivalent to KRW 1.980 million by doing so as to be the actual owner of the above land, and thereby, acquired KRW 50 million in total by receiving KRW 30 million from the damaged person as the down payment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Copy of each protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the police against H and F;

1. Copy of the police statement made to E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to open a name statement, written decision, and each deposit confirmation certificate;

1. In light of the pertinent legal provisions on criminal facts, Articles 347(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act, the reason for sentencing of sentence of imprisonment with prison labor, the name of the Defendant’s name was opened and attempted to sell the said land as if he were the owner of the land equivalent to KRW 1,980,000 at the market price, and the nature of the crime is not good in light of the method of crime, etc.

In addition, the defendant seems to have been aware that the court's open decision was a crime at least at least at the time of concluding a sales contract at a certified judicial scrivener office.

The defendant is also peeped in the circumstances where he attempted to conceal accomplices or destroy evidence after committing a crime.

Defendant has been punished by a fine on two occasions due to fraud.

The damage was not recovered.

However, the defendant is not a party.