Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

As a chairperson of B Urban Development Promotion Committee, the Defendant, along with the head of C Headquarters D Co., Ltd., the agent business of the above Urban Development Project, was willing to undertake an urban development project by forging the consent of the “Written Consent to Replotting Development Plan” and the “Written Consent to Designation of Urban Development Zones” without obtaining consent from E, etc.

1. Forging a private document;

A. On October 25, 2016, the Defendant, along with D, stated “E” in the letter of consent to the replotting urban development plan in the victim E’s name with a view to exercising at the association office located in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si on October 25, 2016, and then forged the said letter of consent by sealing “E” in the state column, “E” in the letter of consent to the project for the development of the replotting urban development plan in the victim E’s name. In addition, using a pen, at the same time and place, the Defendant stated “E”, “E” in the letter of consent to the designation of the urban development zone in the victim E’s name, “E” in the state column, “I buildings in Kimpo-si, Jho-ho”, and “E” in the letter of consent.

Accordingly, in collusion with D, the Defendant forged one copy of “A consent to the replotting urban development plan” in the name of victim E, and one copy of “A consent to the proposal for designation of an urban development zone.”

B. The Defendant, along with D at the same time and at the same place as the above “A” and in the same manner, stated “K” in the letter of consent regarding the projected urban development plan for replotting in the name of the victim K, and in the state column, the Defendant forged the above letter of consent by entering and sealing “K” in the letter of consent, and at the same time and place as above, stated “K” in the letter of consent in the letter of consent for the designation of the urban development zone under the victim K’s name, “K”, in the state column, and in the letter of consent, sealed “K” in the letter of consent.

As a result, the Defendant conspired with D to “A consent to a replotting urban development plan” under the name of the victim K.