logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.01.14 2014고단5888
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a place of business with a shower facility and a locker room installed with the trade name, “C,” which is located on the 5th floor of Yeongdeungpo-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and a place of sexual intercourse.

No one shall engage in the conduct of arranging sexual traffic, such as arranging, soliciting or inducing sexual traffic or providing a place for sexual traffic.

Nevertheless, from August 15, 2014 to September 12, 2014, the Defendant provided 110,000 won in cash in return for sexual intercourse from the male grandchildren who found in the above business establishment, and provided guidance to the smuggling of the above business establishment so that they can have sexual intercourse with the sexual intercourse, and then arranged sexual intercourse against unspecified customers who found the above business establishment for business purpose.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding E;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. concerning facts constituting an offense and the punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Crimes of arranging sexual traffic, etc. with reasons for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act, Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, etc. are deemed to be inferior to those of the women by commercializing their sex and impairing their good morals.

However, the size, business period, profits obtained by the defendant, age, character and conduct of the defendant, family relationship, etc. of the business of this case including the fact that the defendant is against the defendant and the defendant does not have the same criminal records, etc. shall be determined as per the order.

arrow