beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On July 1, 2016, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the Defendant’s instant case (hereinafter “case subject to perjury”) such as occupational embezzlement of No. 584 E, etc. at the court of Suwon District Court No. 310 on July 1, 2016, and was notified of the right to refuse to testify and the punishment for perjury, and became a witness of the said case after being sworn.
Accordingly, the defense counsel of E borrowed money of No. 10 (No. 20 million won on October 24, 2014) and No. 11 (No. 10 million won on November 14, 2014) from the defendant G at the time to the defendant, who was the joint representative director of F at the time, and argued that the defendant E is money without any relationship with the defendant E, and the defendant is not related.
In advance, the contract was made by the contracting parties, and the contract was made only by them, and the contract was made in gold amounting to KRW 20 million, and the 10 million won is not in length, and the contract was made at consulting costs.
In response, “The defense counsel asked the Defendant that “A witness would have borrowed KRW 20 million from Defendant G” again, and the Defendant asked the Defendant that “A witness would have borrowed KRW 1.2 billion in advance to sell the land,” and the Defendant asked the real estate business entity to sell the land in advance, on the other hand, that the money of KRW 1.2 billion was entered into an international trust, but was intended to cancel it.
The defendant gives his answer, and again asks the defendant " who is equivalent to anyone", the defendant gives his answer, "I have the right to lend to him and compensate him."
In response, the Defendant asked the Defendant, “I thousand won or more,” and again asked the Defendant “I thousand won or more, for any reason.” The Defendant entered KRW 10 million to give advice on the land’s name.
The defense counsel responded to the defendant, and again the defendant "the witness borrowed the bank account of the defendant E and made the defendant G with his money transactions."
The Defendant who is to be asked as “ will in the future.”