A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

Punishment of the crime

On September 28, 2017, at the court of Suwon District Court No. 408, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the case of compulsory indecent act against the said court No. 2017No. 5406 E, and was notified of the right to refuse to testify and the punishment for perjury, and subsequently became a witness of the said case after taking an oath.

For this reason, the defense counsel was forced to commit an indecent act against the defendant from F E

On January 19, 2016, a witness (defendant) of around 09:00 asserts that he/she moved to a restaurant along with E and gave an adversium.

The Defendant asked “I” reply, and the defense counsel called “I” was transferred to a restaurant as the case E on the day of the instant case and was transferred to the restaurant and was in the same way as E until the day I complete the erosion.

The Defendant asked “M.” answer to “E and F,” and the defense counsel asked “E and F together with the Amicker on January 19, 2016, so it is not possible for E and F to force E to commit an indecent act under the circumstances in which E and F remain at the same time.

The Defendant who asked “,” refers to “e.g.,” and the Prosecutor “In January 19, 2016, a witness was present at several times.”

The defendant who asked " was present at 7 times".

“Pather,” and the prosecutor’s “after his/her work, anywhere.”

I asked "I have worked to lay down and assist the house in the factory office".

From January 19, 2016 to 07:00, the Defendant testified to the effect that, as the G office had moved from around 07:00 to the restaurant, he was able to commit an indecent act against F in an opportunity in the F0,000 office, E was not a situation.

However, around January 19, 2016, E forced F to commit an indecent act on another F in the office of F, and at the time, there was no fact that the Defendant had committed an abstinence together with E and F.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant;