1. The Defendant’s disposition of determining a disability grade that the Plaintiff rendered on June 1, 2016 is revoked.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On February 23, 2015, the Plaintiff applied for disability benefits to the Defendant on September 30, 2015, after obtaining approval of the medical care from the Defendant, for re-medical care until September 30, 2015, for the purpose of providing a fixed object removal for both sides, which was caused by an accident falling from a shooting bridge at a height of 2 meters in height.

B. On June 1, 2016, the Defendant rendered a disposition to determine the Plaintiff’s disability grade as Class 10 (hereinafter “instant disposition”) No. 14 subparag. 10 (hereinafter “the Plaintiff’s disability grade”) on the ground that “The scope of the exercise of both sides of the Plaintiff is below 90 degrees each, and there remain only the general dynamics in both sides, and the breaths have been cured well after cutting down in the diameter.”

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 6, purport of whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion was carried out both the sporadic sporadic sporadic sporadic spodic spodic spodic spodic spodic spodics and metal plates due to the accident, and the spodic spodic spodic spods

B. The following circumstances, which can be seen by adding the entire purport of the argument as a result of the physical examination entrusted to the head of the Altol University Seoul Escar Hospital in this Court, i.e., radiation inspection of the Plaintiff and SPEC-CT by the Plaintiff, the results of the radioactive examination and SPTT on the right side of the Plaintiff, which are: (a) the verification that the cryposis and heat pressure of the cryp is observed on the part of the cryp joints of the Plaintiff; and (b) in the case of the cryp of the cryp of the left part of the cryp, it is confirmed that the crypology was inserted in the crypary condition of the cryposis; and (c) the physical examination by this court did not appeal the cryp symptoms symptoms in this case,