A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties on October 22, 2018, within C main points located in the Gosung-gun B B in the Gosung-gun of the Gangwon-do (Seoul) around 22:34 on October 22, 2018.

” 는 112 신고를 받고 출동한 D 파출소 소속 경찰관 E 가 인적 사항을 물어 보자 “ 야, 이 개새끼야. 넌 아버지뻘 되는 사람도 몰라보느냐.

“ Doing to read” and making it time twice the parts of the above E with the drinking of the hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties in relation to the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

2. On October 22, 2018, the Defendant who damaged public goods was arrested and detained as a current offender for the same reasons as the described in the foregoing paragraph 1 within the D police box located in the Gosung-gun F of Gangwon-gun on October 22, 2018, and the Defendant complained of the complaints against the Defendant who was arrested and detained as a current offender for the same reason as the described in the foregoing paragraph 1.

Whether they exceeded clothes, she committed murder in the Republic of Korea;

Doing robbery;

p. Ne.

Nabaly, it is possible to unfold the number of pages, when we look at what you go with, and what you go with.

For about 20 minutes, such as the phrase “A”, the disturbance was destroyed by TV at least KRW 700,000 at the market price installed in the box in the above D, head, which was destroyed by several times.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement prepared and made by the police for E;

1. G documents;

1. Investigation report (a attachment of a bridge, a police box, a editing photograph of images, and a case accompanied by CCTV images);

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of damaging goods for public use) and the choice of imprisonment for each crime;

1. Although compensation was made for TV with the reason of sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes, the crime of this case was committed on the ground that the form of interference with the performance of official duties and damage to public goods was inferior, and that the defendant again committed the crime of this case, instead of being aware of even though he was under the period of probation (the current period of probation is limited).