A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

Punishment of the crime

[2015 Highest 4289] On April 10, 2015, the Defendant called the victim E, who was operating D, a logistics agent at the Seoul Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Office, by phone to the victim E, who was operating the distribution agent, “29 million won.” The Defendant will supply the 29 million won old sports at the face of the deposit, and also issue the tax invoice.

“A false statement” was made.

However, as the victim promised, the defendant did not have the intent or ability to deliver the age-sports as above. However, the defendant acquired money from the damaged person and used it to pay the balance of the house to be occupied by the defendant's family.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, was transferred from the victim to the account in the name of the Defendant, KRW 29 million from the seat to the account in the name of the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

[2016 order 38] On October 201, the Defendant, as a person operating a F Office, possessed documents to issue the said company’s tax account statement, such as the business registration certificate of “H,” operated by a high-class village village Ga, G, with a view to having the Defendant receive profits by preparing the said company’s tax account statement and selling it at 2-3% price.

On October 31, 2011, the Defendant entered “17,584,525”, etc. in the supply column of a tax invoice file using a computer in the office located in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I, into the supply column of a tax invoice file using the computer, and printed it out to the Defendant’s name in the supply column, “trade name H, name J,” “a multiple transport charge” in the material column, “15,985,932”, “1,593” in the supply column, “1,598,593” in the supply column, “17,525”, and “17,584,525” in the aggregate column, and then printed it out to the Defendant’s name in advance.

G’s seal was affixed.

Accordingly, the Defendant, for the purpose of uttering, forged a tax invoice in G name, which is a private document on the proof of facts, as shown in the attached list of crimes from around the above day to June 30, 2014.