All prosecutions against the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The facts charged against Defendant B and Defendant C are simplified and they are in dispute over ownership of the buildings in their own birth D and Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu. Defendant A is a building administrator entrusted by the above D with the management of the above building. Defendant B, Defendant C, and Defendant A were not in good appraisal due to a dispute over the above building.

1. On June 4, 2019, around 18:40 on June 4, 2019, Defendant A committed assault against the victims who were kicker B (year 76) and the victim C (year 42) in front of G emotionals located in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, and who were knicker C’s hand, kicker C with his hand, and continued to do so, twice the victim B’s back depth.

2. Defendant B, as described in paragraph (1), at the time and place described in paragraph (1), had the victim’s body damaged by the victim A (the age of 60) who met the back of the back-to-date body one time.

3. The Defendant: (a) avoided the dispute between B and the victim A (the age of 60) at the time and place specified in paragraph (1); (b) committed assault against the victim by having the victim covered her mother and child; (c) cutting the her mother and her mother in front and lower direction.

2. The facts charged in this case, which fall under Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, shall not be prosecuted against the will expressed by the victim under Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act.

However, since it is apparent that each victims expressed their desire not to punish the Defendants, the prosecution of this case against the Defendants is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.