The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the evidence duly admitted by the court below, the court below was just in finding the Defendant guilty of violating the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes among the facts charged in the instant case, and of violating the Narcotics Control Act (excluding the part not guilty in the grounds of appeal). In so doing, contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, the court below did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, exceeding the probative value of indirect evidence, or by misapprehending the legal principles on Article 5(1) of the former Narcotics Control Act (amended by Act No. 10786, Jun. 7, 2011).

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.