The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On November 14:18, 2010, the Defendant: (a) as to November 14:18, 2010, delegated the authority to obtain his/her certificate of the personal seal impression from the Busan Dong-dong community service center; (b) on the proxy form for the certificate of the personal seal impression, the Defendant stated “CD and address E” in the column for the purpose of “Inheritance” in the column for the certificate of the personal seal impression impression and affixed the C’s seal in custody; (c) forged the certificate of the personal seal impression; and (d) submitted it to the public official in charge of the said Dong-dong office, who may not be aware of the fact, as the application for the

2. The instant public prosecution is based on the premise that the deceased C (hereinafter “the deceased”) died on January 4, 2010, and the Defendant cannot be entrusted with the authority to obtain a certificate of the deceased’s personal seal impression from the deceased on November 9, 2010, after the death of the deceased. As such, the Defendant was indicted for forging the power of attorney in the name of the deceased.

However, in full view of the Defendant’s corrected medical certificate, confirmation certificate, medical record copy, and the fact-finding results on the Busan Regional Headquarters of the National Health Insurance Corporation, the Deceased may recognize the Defendant’s death on January 4, 201, which was after November 9, 2010, prepared the power of attorney in the name of the Deceased. Thus, considering the fact that the Defendant was living at the time of preparing the power of attorney, the relationship between the Defendant and the Deceased, etc., it is difficult to deem that the Defendant did not receive delegation from the Deceased, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge

3. In conclusion, the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted pursuant to the latter part of Article 325 of the