1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion 0 C lent KRW 23 million to C on July 17, 2015, and the Plaintiff transferred the claim against the Defendant to the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff, as a duplicate of the complaint of this case, is a service of a copy of the complaint of this case, notifies the Defendant of the assignment of the claim.

2. In order for the Plaintiff to claim the amount of the instant claim acquisition to the Defendant, it should be acknowledged by evidence that C has “claim” to the Defendant.

However, even based on the data submitted by the Plaintiff, C actually paid money to the Defendant.

It is not sufficient to acknowledge that C has “a claim for lending or return of unjust enrichment” to the Defendant, and there is no evidence to acknowledge otherwise.

(C) The plaintiff did not submit any answer to the preparation order of this court to present evidence proving the existence of the claim against the defendant, and did not appear in the court). 3. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff as the losing party.