Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around July 22, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 13:25, the Defendant: (b) in the front line of subway 4, which is operating in the vicinity of Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government as a mutually advantageous air defense station from the air basin of Dongdaemun-gu; and (c) in the front line of subway 4, the Defendant has to depeach the D President and take the dynamic powers against the unspecified passengers on board the front line.

A victim E (n.e., 51 years old) who was near a large scarcity, such as “A,” and was brut, thereby insulting the victim by openly insulting the victim on the ground that the victim’s brut is bad. In front of other passengers aboard the brut, the victim expressed his or her desire, such as “a day-to-day, prompt, pit, and scarb,” as the large bru, to “a day-to-day, prompt, and scarb.”

2. The Defendant, at the time and place mentioned in paragraph 1, recorded the victim F (57 years of age) of which the Defendant was reporting the Defendant’s desire to take a bath against E, as described in paragraph 1, and as such, recorded the victim F (57 years of age).

The defect, “heat, flab, and flabe,” and the flabede of the victim’s flab, flabed, and flabed the victim’s flab by hand, and flabed the victim’s flab and flab by hand, the victim suffered injury, such as “dume of a wooden part,” which requires treatment for about 14

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police statement made to F and E;

1. Each statement of G and H;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of the statutes governing video CDs taken by witnesses G;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury), Article 311 of the Criminal Act (the point of insult), and the selection of each fine;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. As to the assertion of the Defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order, the Defendant and the defense counsel did not know the fact that the Defendant and his defense counsel engaged in an injury, or that he did not satisfe and satfe the victim’s fat, or that he did not sate the victim’s satfe and sat, and that he fat off the bat at the sat