logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.11.03 2016고단2433
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On April 4, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. in the same court, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Daegu Prison on November 2, 2013.

[2016 Highest 2433] Around January 9, 2015, the Defendant purchased one vehicle for C Eubs, borrowed 5 million won to D, offered the said Eubs car as security along with a waiver of the vehicle, a letter of consent to transfer of the vehicle, etc. Since D did not pay money to the Defendant, it transferred the above Eubs car to the bond company with which the name of Eubs cannot be known.

On October 2015, the Defendant: (a) received a proposal from a bond company with which it is impossible to know the name of the police officer at the early 2015, stating, “The Defendant was transferred to C Ecoos as collateral; (b) received money from a vehicle using Ecoos as collateral at another place; and (c) would not be a re-influor of using GPS and auxiliary key; and (d) accepted it.”

Around 04:00 on October 9, 2015, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim E, “In front of Dacoo-dong 690-1, Tae-dong, Tae-dong, Tae-dong, Tae-gu, Seoul, the Defendant lent 9.1 million won to the victim E, who is a domestic owner as security for Dacoo-dong car.”

However, in fact, the defendant thought that the above Accuss car will be put up as a security after leaving the above Accuss car and using GPS and auxiliary key, and therefore there was no intention to offer the above Accuss car as a security, and even if he borrowed money from the victim due to no special occupation or income, there was no intention or ability to pay the money.

The defendant, in collusion with a bond company with whom the above name cannot be known, deceiving the victim, and received 9.1 million won in cash from the victim, i.e., i., e., 9.1 million won from the victim.

As a result, the defendant was accused of the victim and received property in collusion with the above bond company.

[2016 Highest 2448]

1. Fraud against the victim F.

arrow