logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2020.06.16 2019나103780
건물철거 및 토지인도 등
Text

1. In accordance with the claim for a change in exchange in this court, the Defendant shall attach the attached Form 1,002 square meters to the Plaintiff prior to Seosan-si.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. 1,002 square meters prior to Seosan-si (hereinafter “instant land”) were originally owned D. However, the Plaintiff purchased the instant land from D on May 2, 2003 and completed the registration of ownership transfer on May 12, 2003.

B. 1) On the ground of the instant land, the appraisal report attached Form 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 1 attached Table 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 240 square meters of the housing and warehouse (including the table) in the prefabricated group of “A” group of “A” (hereinafter “A” in this case

(2) The portion of “b” in cement block tanks and 22 square meters in storage (hereinafter referred to as “b” in this case) connected with each point of 10,11,12,13,14,15, and 10 of the same appraisal maps, in sequence, shall be divided into cement block tanks and 22 square meters in storage.

(2) On July 20, 2010, the Defendant prepared a document stating that “each of the buildings shall be repaired and the compensation issue shall be taken over to the owner of the building and signed only the cost of directors if the building is confirmed as a development area,” under the title “each of the buildings in this case and E, the owner of the building in this case,” and the title “each of the buildings in this case,” and the title “each of the buildings in this case.”

3) The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against E seeking the return of unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent of KRW 4,494,348, and the amount of the rent of KRW 49,125,00 from July 1, 2009 to June 30, 2019, and the amount of the rent of KRW 4,494,348, and from September 1, 2009 to the time of delivery of the relevant site (the Daejeon District Court Seosan Branch 2019Da53889) against the said court on April 29, 200. The judgment became final and conclusive on May 28, 2020 as it is. [In the absence of dispute over the grounds for entrustment, evidence No. 1-2, evidence No. 1, 5, evidence No. 7, evidence No. 7, evidence No. 1, and evidence No. 7 of the witness of the Republic of Korea court, evidence No. 13889, Dec. 1, 2019

arrow