logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.06.28 2016고정3490
주거침입
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, each of them is 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person in charge of the acceptance and removal of the decision of a partnership for redevelopment of D houses, and the defendant B is a person who assists the removal at the request of the defendant A.

The Defendants, among residents of the above zone, refused to undergo an appraisal and refused to comply with the request for cooperation by the victim E and the victim F, decided to cancel the main correction device or conduct an appraisal and assessment by intrusion into the victim’s residence in a way exceeding the fence by using the gap in the victim’s house. Defendant B announced the way to the residence of the above victims, and Defendant A conspired to intrude into the house of the victims after the key repair machine was removed and the key repair machine was removed.

1. On July 21, 2016, around 15:00 to 16:00 on July 21, 2016, the Defendants committed the crime against the Victim F, which led to the collection of the Victim F located in Busan-gu G, Busan-gu, the Defendants: (a) ordered the repair machine to set the entrance door locking in the location of the equipment; and (b) Defendant A went into the said house and intruded on the victim’s residence.

2. From July 21, 2016 to 16:00 to 16:00 on July 21, 2016, the Defendants were at home of the victim E located in Busan District, Busan District, and the key repair machine was not well-known to get the gate locker at the location of the vehicle. As the Defendants did not have to get the key repair machine to cover the entrance locker at the location, the Defendants made the non-personal male accompanied to the said place enter the door above the wall above the above dwelling gate, and invaded the victim’s residence and intruded the victim’s house.

As a result, Defendants jointly intruded upon each residence of victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the Defendants’ legal statements

1. Legal statement of a witness I;

1. Each statement made by the witness J and F in the second public trial records;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning the ruling of provisional seizure;

1. Article 2(2)1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act regarding criminal facts, Article 319(1) of the Criminal Act, and each of the fines shall be selected.

arrow