logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.02.09 2016노5059
사기등
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the judgment of the court below is that the punishment imposed by the court below (the punishment No. 2 of the judgment of the court below (the crime of forging a private signature and the crime of forging a signature) No. 1 and No. 3 of the judgment of the court below (the crime of forging a private signature and the crime of forging a signature of the above investigation) shall be sentenced to imprisonment for 2 months, paragraph 1 (misappropriation) of the judgment of the court below, and paragraph 2 (the crime of violating the Resident Registration Act) of the judgment of the court below, and paragraph 3 (2) of the judgment of the judgment of the court below (the crime of forging a private signature and the crime of forging a signature of the above investigation) No. 2 and No. 3 (6 months of imprisonment for each crime listed in the attached Table No. 2, No. 3 (the crime of forging a private signature and the crime of forging a signature of the above investigation) is too unreasonable).

2. In full view of the circumstances that are disadvantageous to the defendant, taking into account in the judgment of the court below, there is no special change of circumstances that may change the sentence imposed by the court below, and other circumstances that include the defendant's age, sexual conduct, environment, and circumstances after the crime, etc., such as the defendant's age, age of the defendant, and other conditions of sentencing, which are the conditions of punishment as shown in the records, do not seem to be unfair because the sentence imposed by the court below is too excessive, in light of the circumstances where the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case within the period of repeated crime, and the method and quality of the crime are inferior (the violation of the law and the quality of the crime) and favorable circumstances (the amount of damage to the crime is not significant, and some of the crimes

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow