logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2012.03.22 2010가합88922
사해신탁취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The Plaintiff, among the costs of lawsuit, includes costs incurred by participation.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff and the Intervenor’s Intervenor (hereinafter “the Intervenor”)’s overall relation 1) Muan-gun is located in the area of approximately approximately KRW 20 million in the area of not less than 1,00,000 m2,00 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,00

(2) The Eastan International Investment Limited Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the “Dong Taean International Investment Corporation”) as a Chinese corporation.

) On April 17, 2007, the corporation and the deleln&A (hereinafter referred to as the "corporation") were changed into the Korea-Pacific Corporation.

In the case of all corporations referred to in this judgment, the indication of "stock company" shall be deducted from the second to the second in the case of any corporation.

On December 23, 2005, the Korea Industrial Complex Development Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Korea Industrial Complex Development Co., Ltd.”) was changed to the Korea-China Urban Development Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Korea-China Urban Development Co., Ltd.”) which was a company implementing the business of this case on January 15, 2010.

2) On January 18, 2008, the Korea-U.S. Urban Development (hereinafter “the instant basic contract”) and the Korea-U.S. National Agricultural Cooperative Federation (hereinafter “CF”) entered into a basic contract relating to the instant project (hereinafter “the instant basic contract”) with each of the Korea-U.S. Construction Week and the Korea-U.S. National Agricultural Cooperative Federation (hereinafter “CF”) involved in the instant project.

3) After that, the Korea Development Corporation is a joint implementation corporation for the instant project, the Plaintiff et al. as a Korean construction investor (the Korea Construction Week changed from Dasan Construction to the Plaintiff), the UN Investment Securities Co., Ltd. as a Korean financial investor, and the Intervenor newly participated in the instant project as a strategic investor, and the existing investors, such as the Uanan-gun, etc., such as the aforementioned new investors on December 29, 2008, are the Supplementary Convention between the said new investors and the shareholders on the instant basic contract (hereinafter “Supplementary Convention between the Stockholders”).

(4) On the other hand, the supplementary agreement between the shareholders of this case was concluded on December 29, 2008.

arrow