The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. As to the grounds for appeal of this case, the fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and is contrary to the recognition of the crime of this case, there is no record of criminal punishment, and the fact that the defendant led to the confession of perjury before the judgment of this case became final and conclusive, etc. are considered favorable to the defendant.

However, perjury requires punishment corresponding to the crime that obstructs the proper exercise of judgment authority, which is the judicial action of the State, and the discovery of substantial truth, and the defendant repeated false testimony to influence the result of the criminal trial against B, as well as the fact that the contents of testimony could have an influence on the result of the trial, etc., and the court below seems to have sentenced to a fine less than the summary order in consideration of the above favorable circumstances, etc. of the defendant's age, character and behavior, family relation, motive and background of the crime, and the result of the crime, etc., it cannot be deemed that the sentence of the court below (two million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.