1. The Defendant received on May 14, 201 from the Seoul Eastern District Court as to the real estate stated in the attached list to the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts (applicable for recognition: Fact that there is no dispute, each entry in the evidence set forth in subparagraphs 1 through 3, witness C's testimony, and purport of whole pleadings);

A. The Defendant is a business entity that purchases high-priced master products in Europe through a purchasing agent for the trade name of “D” and supplies them to foreign language at the local level.

B. 1) As between October 201, the Defendant: (a) between C and C, the list of the purchase fund and the purchase name to C; and (b) C are Japanese language with the meaning of transportation, namely, transiting to the recruited travelr or so-called “transporting.”

(i) directly depart from Europe with persons specialized in Europe, purchase products on the list of purchased goods in Europe with the above funds, and send the purchase list to the Defendant at that time;

) After delivering the said purchased goods to the Incheon Airport Customs Office after depositing them in the name of Incheon Airport Customs Office in the name of C. The said purchased goods are found to be deposited with a deposit certificate for the said purchased goods and with a copy of the passport, and they are returned to Japan (if so, to the Defendant) by sending them to the Incheon Airport Customs office.

(B) The Defendant sent the Defendant a test after receiving the product from which he was designated by the Defendant. The Defendant sent the test to the Defendant.

) The contract was entered into for the consignment of purchase of a named product (hereinafter “instant consignment contract”).

2) C) By implementing the instant consignment contract, C used the European value-added tax refund amount with respect to the purchase of the instant consignment contract, as a travel expense for travel of travels and the cost of delivering it to Japan, and the remaining amount with respect to personal benefits.

3. The defendant does not examine whether the purchases of household goods are actually deposited in the Incheon Airport Customs Office, and the purchase list and the stalking list sent by C, and the test list sent by Japan.