logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2013.07.03 2013고단387
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

The list of seized articles in total shall be confiscated as provided for in subparagraphs 1 through 4.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who conducts juvenile game providing business with the trade name "D Gameland" from the 2nd floor of the military city in Ansan-si.

No one shall provide, exhibit or keep the contents of game products different from those of the game products rated for distribution or use, and exchange or arrange exchange or repurchase the results of tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of the game products for business purposes.

Nevertheless, the defendant from May 3, 2012 to the same year.

8. On 15:30 on 29. 15. 15:30, a 40 game machine of the above D Gameland, which was rated in the above D Gameland, installed a database for the operation of the "marine e-mail-electronic machine", which is a speculative electronic machine, and operated a virtual cryptization program (B: hereinafter "marine crypt" and the "crypt" program through the Drb "W" so that the program can be established and implemented, and exchange the free gifts discharged according to the result of the game with 10% (cryption cost) and the remaining 90% in cash.

Summary of Evidence

Application of the defendant's statutory statement, seizure records, records of enforcement support

1. Relevant Article on criminal facts, subparagraph 4 of Article 45 and Article 32 (1) 2 of the Act on the Promotion of the Game Industry Selection of Punishment (Provision of Game Products different from the contents of classification), Article 44 (1) 2 and Article 32 (1) 7 of the Game Industry Promotion Act, and the selection of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. 몰수 형법 제48조 제1항 제1호, 제2호, 게임산업진흥에 관한 법률 제44조 제2항 양형이유 ▷ 반성의 빛을 보이고 있음, ▷피고인은 이미 여러 차례에 걸친 형사처벌 전력을 받은 전력이 있음, 이 사건 범행 규모 및 기간 등을 고려하면 피고인 스스로 실제 업주라고 주장하는 이상...

arrow