1. The Defendant’s 6,275,114 won to Plaintiff A and 5% per annum from April 3, 2019 to March 30, 2021.

(c).. c.

1) Since property damage of this case caused by the destruction or damage of the fire of this case is destroyed or damaged, the company asserts that the items and quantity of the articles that were impossible to repair, the unit price, the market price, etc. are as follows (unsured: unit price): 50,205 123 2,100 2,580 2,580 620 620 924 620 924 60 62,80 62424 924 60 65 72, 60 30 65 60 72, 80 696 1,30 240 240 40 5 70 4,826 30 50 1,504 70 4,50 70 50 30 50 4,6310 50 64 70

In addition, it is argued that the loss caused by the failure of the Plaintiff Company to supply to E is a special loss.

In general, damages caused by illegal acts shall be deemed ordinary damages where the goods have been destroyed, the market price at the time of their destruction; where the goods have been damaged, the expenses incurred in repairing or restoring them to their original state, or where repair or restoration to their original state is impossible or where the expenses are excessive (see Supreme Court Decision 2005Da44633, Apr. 28, 2006, etc.). In cases where it is impossible to restore the goods, etc. due to fire, the amount of exchange value decreased due to the damage shall be deemed as the amount of re-financing.