logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.04.24 2013노4433
약사법위반
Text

All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

Reasons

1. Defendant A’s part

A. At the time of the occurrence of the grounds for appeal, K with a pharmacist's license was in a pharmacy dispensary, and Defendant B sold "TN" in accordance with the above K's instruction, but Defendant B directly sold the above medicine, and the judgment of the court below which found Defendant B guilty of the facts charged of this case, is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

B. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below: (1) Defendant B, an employee of E pharmacy, sold at around 13:52, Oct. 4, 2012, 201 one disease in 1,50 won at the above pharmacy; (2) K does not appear in the video recorded at the time of the occurrence of the instant case, and K does not have the image or voice recorded; (3) during the police investigation, Defendant B worked from every week to every Saturday; and (4) from October 4, 2012, Defendant B sent out at 8:0 p.m.; (5) Defendant B’s phone call without any time-based instructions from the above pharmacist to participate in the instant case; and (4) Defendant B’s phone call without any time-based instructions from the above pharmacist’s instructions to participate in the instant case.

arrow