logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2014.08.22 2014고단573
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,00,000.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On November 16, 2012, the Defendant violated the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (i.e., arranging commercial sex acts) is an actual employer who had taken over and operated a “Frinecing clinic” registered under the name of Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government fourth floor E.

From November 16, 2012 to March 6, 2013, the Defendant employed a female employee who cannot know his/her name at the above F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F FM, and provided the female employee with 150,000 won or 160,000 won in cash from his/her male descendant who found his/her place of location, and provided him/her with a credit card settlement, and provided the female employee with sexual intercourse with his/her fingers.

Accordingly, the defendant committed commercial sex acts such as arranging commercial sex acts.

B. On November 6, 2012, the Defendant: (a) paid KRW 2.5 million per month to B, the business owner of the Franchising clinic; (b) agreed that B was present at the police station and was subject to punishment such as a fine; and (c) was operating the Franchising clinic; (d) around August 2013, the Defendant was informed that B was accused of the said Franchising clinic for the business of arranging sexual traffic, etc.; and (e) said B was urged to attend the police station and undergo an investigation as promised in advance.

Accordingly, around December 10, 2013, B appeared in the Seoul Song-gu Police Station and was examined by the defendant, and B made a false statement to the effect that, as the actual business owner of the above Fanchea treatment station, he had female employees engaged in sexual traffic by allowing them to engage in sexual traffic in return for payment of sexual traffic from customers.

As a result, the defendant had B escape the defendant who committed a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment.

2. Defendant B, on November 6, 2012, concluded that Defendant B was present at the police station and was punished for a fine, etc., if he/she lent his/her business registration name under the condition that he/she received KRW 2,500,000 per month from A who took over the Franchising clinic.

arrow