A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 2012, the Defendant altered official documents using a computer in a notice of the progress of handling the case on which the official seal of the head of Pyeongtaek-si Police Station is affixed within the office of Pyeongtaek-si B.

C. In the investigation of D’s account books, the investigator completed his internal investigation that it is impossible for the investigator to conduct the investigation by destroying receipts, monthly balance sheets, etc. (D.) as shown in the foregoing attached Form.

In addition, the phrase "(the term of retention of important documents in article 18(6) of the Association shall be five years)" shall be added.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the defendant altered one copy of the notice of the progress of handling the case in the name of Pyeongtaek Police Station, which is an official document.

2. Around October 12, 2012, the Defendant posted an altered official document on the bulletin board of Pyeongtaek-si E-type taxi platform at Pyeongtaek-si, and exercised the altered official document by means of mail to D members.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding F;

1. F’s statement in the second interrogation protocol of the defendant against the defendant at the police;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on altered official documents;

1. Relevant Article 225 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Articles 229 and 225 of the Criminal Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The sentence is to be rendered in the same manner as the disposition, considering the defendant's age, occupation, criminal records, circumstances of crimes, etc. including the fact that the defendant's reason for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act is against the recognition of the crime, and the defendant has no criminal record