The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The issue of resumption of closed pleadings is the matter belonging to the court's discretion, and according to the records, the court below proceeded with the public trial in the presence of the public defender and rendered a lawful conclusion of pleadings. Thus, it cannot be said that the court did not accept the application for resumption of pleadings by the private defense counsel, and rendered a judgment on the date of the announced decision, thereby practically infringing the right to receive assistance

In addition, examining the reasoning of the judgment below in light of the records, we affirm the court below's rejection of the defendant's claim on the mental and physical disorder based on the circumstances as stated in its reasoning, and there is no error of law such as misconception of facts

Meanwhile, under Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for not less than ten years has been imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed. Thus, in this case where a more minor sentence has been imposed on the defendant, the argument that the sentencing of the punishment

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.