The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

According to the records, the defendant appealed against the judgment of the first instance, and argued that the sentencing was unfair, along with mistake of facts on the grounds of appeal.

Therefore, the court below's decision on the defendant's unfair argument of sentencing is just, and there is no error of law by misunderstanding the legal principles on the subject of adjudication.

In addition, the issue of whether the closed pleadings are resumed or not belongs to the court's discretion, and according to the records, the court below held a trial at any of the national defense counsel and decided that the closed pleadings were lawfully closed. Thus, the defendant and the national defense counsel were not accepted and the judgment was rendered on the date of the announced declaration without accepting the motion to resume the pleadings.

that the court infringed the right to a trial.

subsection (b) of this section.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.