logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2019.10.08 2019고단4726
사기
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months and by imprisonment for three months.

, however, from the date this judgment becomes final.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On April 11, 2019, Defendant A was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for fraud at the Incheon District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 5, 2019.

Defendant

B On November 22, 2018, the Incheon District Court sentenced two years of suspension of the execution to four months of imprisonment for fraud at the Incheon District Court on November 30, 2018, which became final and conclusive on November 30, 2018, and on December 12, 2018, the Incheon District Court sentenced one year of suspension of the execution to four months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Incheon District Court, which became final and conclusive on December 20, 2018.

【Criminal Facts】

The Defendants, as if they were to sell the used vehicle at a price much higher than that of the market price, advertised false goods on the medium and high-speed sales website, enticed customers who want to purchase a middle and high-speed vehicle into the middle and high-speed sales complex, and attempted to prepare a contract as if they were to sell the vehicle on the advertisement, and to purchase the vehicle at a lower level than the market price by notifying the other vehicles of the significant defects such as additional costs.

On May 31, 2018, at the Seo-gu Incheon Used Car Sales Complex, the Defendants: (a) completed a vehicle sales contract under the condition that the victim G, who had contacted with D’s Internet site, by reporting the advertisement “Doluri Lice E in April 2017, 126.70, and F, is sold in cash to 8.5 million won,” and (b) approximately 30 minutes after the victim’s entry into a vehicle sales contract under the condition that “18 million won is required to take off a premium vehicle.” The contract already concluded is impossible to cancel, and thus, it is said that the victim may live in a vehicle with the amount of 15 million won in lieu of a premium vehicle.”

Then, Defendant A made a false statement to the victim, “The vehicle price of KRW 30,660,000 shall be KRW 600,000,000 and the loan shall be KRW 37,500,000 shall be paid for 60 months, and the loan may be terminated by paying KRW 37,50,000 shall be paid at the present time.”

(b).

arrow