logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.09.11 2018나20209
구상금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

3. The judgment of the court of first instance is rendered in accordance with paragraph (1).

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal as described in the following two paragraphs, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

2. The highest part of the judgment of the court of first instance, on the 2nd page 7 and 9, each of the “Amenmanast Co., Ltd.” is deemed to be each “Amenask’s Republic of Korea”.

Article 132,00,000 won (=criminal agreement amounting to 30,000,000 won - self-liability limit amounting to 100,000 won) of the first instance judgment shall be deemed as follows: “132,00,000 won” (=criminal agreement amounting to 30,000,000 won) and “1,000,000 won for self-liability insurance amounting to 2,00,000,000 won for self-liability insurance amounting to 30,000,000 won for 2,00,000,000 won for non-liability insurance amounting to 4, 7, respectively.”

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and thus, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. However, since it is obvious that " February 8, 2018" in Article 1 of the judgment of the court of first instance is a clerical error in the text of " February 22, 2018," it is corrected

arrow