logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.02.14 2018고정794
상해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant and the victim B ( South, 59 years old) are the workplace club fee working at the same workplace, and frequently disputes were frequently occurred due to the lack of good reputation.

At around 21:00 on November 10, 2017, the Defendant, at the night team leader's office of the 3rd floor of the Ddong, filed a complaint against the victim B (the South and 59 years old) to talk about the contents of the dispute about himself/herself and the horse with him/her to E at the night team leader's office of the 5th floor of the same day, and the victim, who was seated in the chair, was able to talk about the victim's inside part of the victim at two times, and the victim was able to talk about the victim's hand on two occasions with the defect that the victim tried to take from his/her will, and the victim was able to take a strong knife the two knife of the victim's hand, and the victim was divided into two knife of the victim's hand and the knife's knife's stroke, which require two weeks

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness B, E, and F;

1. Investigative Report (Attachment of Copy of Documentary Records, Certificates, etc.), each package inserts (Evidence Nos. 13 through 19 of the Evidence List), investigation report (B submitted files attachment of CDs), CDs;

1. The application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the photographs of the victim victim B [the defendant may recognize the credibility of the victim's statement in a case where it is acknowledged based on objective evidence that he/she had received treatment on the part in an emergency room immediately after the case, although he/she argues that there is no fact of putting the victim's hand on the part of the victim, he/she does not seem to have been in a special exaggeration or false intervention in the victim's statement about damage situations, and the contents of the statement are consistent

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. In light of the contents and attitude of the victim’s testimony in the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the illegality of the defendant’s act of getting the victim’s grandchildren at the time of the instant case does not seem to be relatively large, but do not neglect.

arrow