The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The defendant is not guilty, and the summary of the judgment of innocence is publicly notified.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant of mistake of facts did not inflict an injury on the victim by plucking, plucking, plucking, etc. the victim’s breath.

The judgment of the court below which convicted the Defendant of the facts charged of this case is erroneous by mistake or misapprehension of legal principles.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (one million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. On September 28, 2012, the summary of the charge is as follows: (a) the Defendant: (b) around 03:00 on September 28, 2012, at the victim C (the age of 40) and the “Eju” located in Seopopo City D where the Defendant engaged in his/her business; and (c) the Defendant’s misfincing with the customer was dissatisfied with other customers; and (d) under the upper limit of the term portion, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim, such as the victim’s flabing and flabing the flab, which requires approximately four weeks of treatment.

B. The lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged by comprehensively taking account of the evidence presented in its judgment.

C. The evidence consistent with the facts charged in the instant case is insufficient to recognize the facts charged in the instant case where the Defendant inflicted bodily injury on the victim, such as the victim’s bather bat and bather bat gat gat gat gat gat gat gat gat gat gat gat gat gat gat gat gat gat gat gat gat gat gat gat gat gat gat gat gat gat gat

1. The victim did not fit the defendant, and rather, the defendant was in the room where he was in F, and the defendant saw her fly fly and fly fly fly fly, "Skin flue in South Korea". In addition, the defendant fested the victim's head, leading the victim's head, leading the victim out of the cement pole.