1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. A. A summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion 1) On June 2014, 2014, the Plaintiff is a motor vehicle indicated in the separate sheet from the head of the Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si, the head of the main station located in Sungwon-si C

(2) The Plaintiff purchased the instant automobile at KRW 4,00,000. At the time, the Plaintiff was aware that the instant automobile was distributed by the Defendant, and the Defendant renounced ownership of the instant automobile. As such, the Defendant is obligated to implement the procedure for ownership transfer registration for the instant automobile to the Plaintiff.

B. According to the Plaintiff’s assertion, the Plaintiff purchased the instant automobile from the head of the station, not the Defendant, under his name, and the Defendant consented to the transfer of the instant automobile.

The Defendant renounced ownership solely on the fact that the instant motor vehicle was distributed by the Defendant, without any assertion or proof as to the fact that the Defendant sold the instant motor vehicle to the head of the said head, and that the instant motor vehicle was distributed by the Defendant.

The plaintiff's assertion is without merit, since the above kitchen does not naturally become the owner of the motor vehicle of this case (it seems that the true owner of the motor vehicle of this case is likely to be different).

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.