1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. On April 4, 2014, the Defendant asserted that “A motor vehicle is needed for business, and the Defendant cannot purchase a motor vehicle under his/her name with a bad credit holder. As the Plaintiff purchased a motor vehicle under his/her name, he/she will transfer the name of the motor vehicle to himself/herself and make an installment payment as the principal credit is restored.” The Plaintiff issued all documents necessary for the purchase of the motor vehicle to the Defendant, and the Defendant purchased the instant motor vehicle under the name of the Plaintiff.

However, unlike the above agreement, the defendant did not pay the installment payments, insurance premiums, and taxes of the motor vehicle of this case at all, and the plaintiff urged the defendant to transfer the name of the motor vehicle of this case several times, and the defendant continued to transfer the name of the motor vehicle of this case but did not perform this.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to take over the transfer registration procedure for the instant motor vehicle from the plaintiff in accordance with the above agreement.

2. The evidence presented by the Plaintiff alone that the Defendant agreed on the content as alleged by the Plaintiff.

(3) In the case of this case, there is no evidence to acknowledge the agreement to accept the transfer registration procedure of this case.

(M) According to the statement in Gap evidence No. 2, the defendant prepared and delivered a letter to the plaintiff around August 13, 2014 that "to deliver the instant vehicle by August 20, 2014" to the plaintiff on or around August 13, 2014. 3. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion is without merit, and it is dismissed.