logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2015.12.23 2015고정1681
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Criminal facts

The Defendant, at around 16:00 on October 9, 2015, driven the B Otoba, and drives the two-lane road in front of Ansan-si, Ansan-si, Ansan-si along one-lanes from the side of the modern apartment to the third apartment distance of modern second apartment at about 30km each hour.

It was caused by the three-distance intersection.

Since there is an intersection with a signal apparatus, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle in accordance with the signals.

Nevertheless, even though the Defendant neglected this to stop signal, the Defendant brought to the left-hand left-hand turn from the opposite side of the Orala that the Defendant is driving on the right-hand side of the victim D's DNA driving, which was driven by the Defendant under the new code, to the right-hand side.

Accordingly, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as the closure of the bones first, which requires treatment for about five weeks, due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. The actual condition of traffic accidents (1) (2);

1. An accident-related photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant Article 3(1) and the proviso to Article 3(2)1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines (Article 268 of the Criminal Act, although the degree of injury to the victim of a traffic accident is relatively heavy, the confession and reflect of the defendant, the fact that the defendant is entering into a comprehensive insurance policy on the traffic accident on the part of the defendant's driver, and

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow