logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2013.12.27 2013고정646
상해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 21, 2013, the Defendant, at the D cafeteria located in Seo-gu Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon, around 21:00, while drinking together with the victim E and his woman F, did not have a good appraisal by doing a dispute with the victim during the past. The victim was greged again, and the victim was greged, and greged up the victim's head debt, greged up to the bottom, and greged the victim's head debt, and greged up to the 28-day treatment. The Defendant sustained the victim's injury on the part of the victim, who continued to walk once, caused the victim to undergo approximately 28-day treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E, G and F;

1. Some statements concerning the suspect examination protocol of the defendant;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion of injury to E in the judgment of the defendant and his defense counsel, and the defendant did not agree with the defendant's entrance part of the victim E, and the defendant's act constitutes self-defense or legitimate act, since the defendant's body was caused to commit the crime of this case in the process of leaving the defendant on the floor and leaving the defendant on the floor.

In light of all the circumstances such as the motive and circumstance leading up to the instant crime, it is reasonable to view that the instant crime was committed by the Defendant only within the scope of passive defense as a means of resistance to protect himself/herself from an unilateral illegal attack and escape therefrom, and that the Defendant’s act of self-defense or passive resistance was committed by the Defendant and the defense counsel’s allegation that the act of self-defense or passive resistance constitutes legitimate act is not acceptable.

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

arrow