The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable for a six-month sentence of imprisonment sentenced by the court below to the defendant.

2. It is recognized that the amount of damage caused by the instant crime was only 15,000 won, and that the Defendant deposited the total amount of damage when the Defendant was in a trial.

However, in light of the motive for the larceny crime as stated in Paragraph (1) of the holding of the court below, the defendant made a statement to the investigative agency by holding money in order to put oil oil, and there is doubt as to whether his mistake is against the defendant's wrong because he reversed the statement that he would have taken money to purchase a vinyl covering the things which he displayed in the court of the first instance, and the defendant had been punished due to the same veterinary act several times, and the fact that the defendant committed the crime of this case more than 10 months, even though he had been punished due to the same veterinary act, and the fact that the defendant committed the crime of this case more than 10 months, the defendant committed the crime of this case by taking into account the circumstances leading to each of the crimes of this case, the circumstances after the crime, the age, character and conduct of the defendant, etc., the sentence of the court below is unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.