The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On June 10, 2003, at around 19:18, the Defendant violated the restriction on the operation of a vehicle by having A, one of its corporate partners, operate a vehicle in a state exceeding 1.06 tons exceeding 1.06 tons of the modern 5 tons, while operating a vehicle in a state exceeding 1.06 tons, which does not exceed 10 tons of the statutory minimum weight on the road in front of the 26.9 kilometer-ri Highway 26.9 kilometers on the road.

2. The above facts charged fall under Articles 86, 83(1)2, and 54(1) of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005). However, according to the decision of the Constitutional Court, the above part of Article 86 of the former Road Act, "where an agent, employee, or other worker of a corporation commits a violation under Article 83(1)2 with respect to the business of the corporation, a fine under the relevant Article shall be imposed on the corporation, as well as the corporation, shall be imposed retroactively according to the decision of unconstitutionality of Article 86 of the former Road Act."

Thus, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act