logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2017.07.04 2017고정44
명예훼손
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a trade name of “C”, and the victim D is a person operating a business entity that designs a banner used in white turf, turf, etc., with the trade name of “E”, and the victim D is not having good appraisal, such as calling a phone to the Defendant and protesting against the same design produced by the victim company at his/her own discretion due to the fact that the same design as the design produced by the victim company was used by the victim company from the Defendant company.

In fact, since the victim had never been employed as an employee of F in the past, it did not sell the product by stealing the design technology that he/she had taken out without permission, and did not file a complaint against the Defendant’s customers for the purpose of receiving the agreement. However, the Defendant requested the Defendant to place a banner, etc. on or around July 8, 2016, and used it by ordering the Defendant’s “C” operated by the Defendant.

G With respect to the work reported from the injured party to the violation of the Copyright Act, “E” means “E is currently in progress of sale by stealing F Design as an employee of the F Design as well as the F Design Technology,” “E uses the F Design, and is not at the risk of any who will file a complaint against the injured party”. “E does not currently engage in funeral, thereby filing a complaint against C by theft of design and bring a withdrawal of one million won agreement from each customer.” At that time, H called “C” explained that at the time the injured party filed a complaint against the accused and the accused for the request for the repair of the tea banner, the injured party filed a complaint against the Defendant as a violation of the Copyright Act.” “E is not a bit image format that is so obvious that it is not a separate one, and that the injured party sold the F Design with stolen goods and made a complaint against the Defendant’s reputation by pointing out the victim’s reputation.”

arrow