logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2016.11.10 2016고정509
절도
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 10, 2016, the Defendant: around 20:29, at the C convenience store located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seocheon-gu; using a gap where surveillance is neglected, the Defendant stored the amount equivalent to KRW 2,600 in the market price of the car cans owned by the victim D, which is located in the display stand, in a household, and stolen it.

2. On April 12, 2016, around 08:08, the Defendant stolen the amount equivalent to KRW 2,600 per market price of the car cans in the same manner as described in paragraph (1).

3. On April 12, 2016, the Defendant stolen the amount equivalent to KRW 5,750 per market value of beer in the same place as described in paragraph (1) at around 21:22, and in the same manner, at the same time.

4. On April 13, 2016, the Defendant stolen the amount equivalent to KRW 5,750 per market price of beer at the same place as described in paragraph (1) around 00:24, and in the same manner, at the same time.

5. On April 13, 2016, the Defendant stolen an amount equivalent to KRW 5,750 per market price of beer at the same place as described in paragraph (1) at around 09:11, and in the same manner, at the same time.

6. On April 13, 2016, at around 18:20, the Defendant stolen the amount equivalent to KRW 5,750 per market price of beer in the same manner as described in paragraph (1).

7. On April 13, 2016, at around 22:22, the Defendant stolen the amount equivalent to KRW 5,750 per market price of beer in the same manner and in the same manner as indicated in paragraph (1).

Accordingly, the Defendant stolen the beer worth KRW 33,950 over seven occasions.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of each of the visual Acts and subordinate statutes to a CCTV photograph or CCTV image course;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act Article 334(1) has been repeatedly committed on seven occasions, and the damage has not been recovered, the victim is punished by the defendant, while the defendant is punished by the same kind of crime.

arrow