Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On February 21, 2014, at around 06:05, the Defendant attempted to intrude upon the victim’s residence by opening a door door door and opening a window on the ground that the victim would give a gift even though he/she refused to meet, and attempted to do so even though he/she was urged by the police officer who was dispatched after receiving 112 report, the Defendant attempted to intrude upon the victim’s residence, such as intending to write down the door door cres of the door door opened by even even so far to interview the police officer, but did not go to the wind of the police officer and attempted to do so. However, the Defendant did not go to the wind of the police officer.
2. At around 06:51 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) intending to enter the D’s house, as described in paragraph (1) of the same Article; (b) 112 of the same day; (c) was arrested by the police station Epic police box affiliated with the said 112 police box; and (d) was arrested by G as a flagrant offender committing attempted intrusion; (d) the Defendant committed assault, such as: (a) the cellular device and bank were on the floor; (b) the f’s right course was obstructed; (c) when the said F’s breast part was walking and drinking; and (d) committed assault by hand, such as pushed the said G’s chest.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the control of crimes.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Each legal statement of witness F, G, and D;
1. Application of investigation reports, on-site photographs-related Acts and subordinate statutes;
1. Articles 136 (1), 322, and 319 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;
1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;
1. Although there are many records of punishment due to injuries, obstruction of performance of official duties, etc., the Defendant had repeatedly committed each of the crimes of this case. Each of the crimes of this case was attempted to intrude into the residence of the Hague Women's Maternal, and reported the attempted crimes.