logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.10.19 2020고단4667
재물손괴등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, while residing in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government subparagraph B C, was aware of the victim D (n, 28 years of age) residing in the same loan.

1. 재물손괴 피고인은 2020. 6. 4. 03:43경 위 B 1층 로비에서, 자물쇠로 잠겨있는 피해자 E 소유의 마스터키 보관함을 손으로 잡아당겨 보관함 문을 부숴 피해자 소유의 물건을 손괴하였다.

2. The Defendant attempted to intrude upon the victim’s residence by taking the said date, time, and place in the above manner, and thereafter acquiring marina Turkey at the victim’s residence. The Defendant attempted to intrude marina Turkey upon the victim’s residence by taking the victim’s front door, and by removing the correction device. However, the Defendant attempted to escape on the part of the victim’s right to cancel the victim’s residence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Articles 322 and 319 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of attempted intrusion on residence) and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act is that the defendant confessions each of the crimes of this case, and the defendant commits the crimes of this case somewhat contingent and contingent, and the defendant commits each of the crimes of this case during the grace period after being sentenced to the suspension of the execution of six months for the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act, even though he was sentenced to the suspension period of the execution of two years for the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act, the defendant does not have the previous violation, the defendant does not want the punishment of the defendant by mutual consent with the victim of the crime of attempted intrusion upon residence, and the punishment shall be determined as ordered by taking into account all the factors revealed in the course of the arguments of this case such as character, character and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, circumstances after the crime, and criminal records

arrow