logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.06.01 2014가합11386
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The defendant's 640,780,446 won to the plaintiff A, 10,000,000 won to the plaintiff B, and 5,00,000 won to the plaintiff C and D respectively.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The party-related Plaintiff A is a person who had an operation conducted by the F Medical Center established and operated by the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) and had the complete paralysis of the lower half-yearly movement and sense of sense, the safety paralysis and pain of the upper end, and the sense of sense due to the damage of the number of water, and Plaintiff B is the wife of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff C and D are the children of Plaintiff A.

B. On May 6, 2014, at around 03:00, Plaintiff A 1 left her to the right after she was frighted from her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her.

3) On May 7, 2014, Plaintiff A started learning in line with the direction of doctor G around the morning and started learning. At around 15:00 on the same day, Plaintiff A was shotly shotly fluord with hot scarcitys around 10-11, and 2-3 on the same day, and scarcitys and scarcitys did not show symptoms around 19:00 on the same day, the medical professionals at Defendant Hospital conducted a chest MRI test at around 19:00 on the same day, and as a result of the examination, Plaintiff A was “second scarcitys” at the 6 chest - 1st head-1 head-2 head-2 head-2 (hereinafter referred to as “second scarcitys”).

In addition, the father was observed around the department, and the medical staff of the defendant hospital was the plaintiff A around 00:30 on May 8, 2014.

arrow