logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.04.02 2014고단9131
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등협박)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Criminal facts

1. Around October 21, 2014, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective action, deadly weapons, etc.) and interfered with his/her duties: (a) around October 21, 2014, at a restaurant operated by the Victim C in Seo-gu Incheon, Incheon, the Defendant d (52 years of age) was in possession of the victim for the reason that the victim D (19.5cm in total length, approximately 10cm in knife in knife) did not employ him/her as a daily worker, leaving the victim D, and “4 people of knife.e., four people of knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife.

Accordingly, the defendant, carrying dangerous things, threatened the victim D and obstructed the victim C's restaurant business.

2. On October 2, 2014, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (collective violence, deadly weapons, etc.) and obstructed the performance of duties: (a) around 23:40 on October 2, 2014, the Defendant stated at the places indicated in paragraph (1); (b) the victim C, a dangerous object that the victim C was in possession of on the ground that the victim C refused to drink himself/herself, that he/she would display a date server ( approximately 25 cm in total length, approximately 13 cm in length on the day); and (c) the victim, who was in possession, would be free from entering the place and let the customers in his/her place get out of the place and enter the place; and (d) the victim E (age 60) was boomed three times in the victim E (age 60).

In this respect, the defendant, carrying dangerous things, assaults the victim E, and interfered with the victim C restaurant business.

3. On October 3, 2014, at around 17:30 on October 3, 2014, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by stating that “A police officer is a person who reported, puts out, or set up” the victim C was called “a person who was reported,” on the ground that the police officer was dispatched by the report 112 as of the preceding 112 report, and preventing the victim from entering the restaurant business.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement; 1.1.

arrow