1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant shall be revoked, and all the plaintiffs' claims corresponding to the revoked part shall be revoked.

1.The following facts may be found, either in dispute between the parties or in Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 5 (including the branch numbers for which the branch numbers are attached), and in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings as a result of the request for appraisal by the court of first instance to the appraiser G of the court of first instance:

Plaintiff

A1) On June 10, 2013, the driver of HA, who was insured by the Defendant’s comprehensive motor vehicle insurance, was driving the said motor vehicle from the 2nd amo-dong, Mao-dong, Mao-gu, Simsan-si, Mao-gu, Simsan-si, and was owned by Plaintiff A (hereinafter “Plaintiff A”).

2) The instant accident was caused by the shocking accident (hereinafter “instant accident”).

2) After the instant accident, Plaintiff A’s vehicle was repaired by the J, and the Defendant paid KRW 1,980,000 as insurance money.

3) The main repair content of the Plaintiff A’s vehicle is the Hydrid exchange, the front panel exchange, and the front panel board board board board. (B) On June 22, 2013, the Plaintiff A’s driver, who subscribed to the Defendant’s comprehensive motor vehicle insurance, driven the said vehicle on the roads near the Sinpo-gu Mapo-dong, Mapo-gu, Mapo-gu, Mapo-gu, U.S. A., and caused an accident attributable to Plaintiff B, who is the Plaintiff B’s owner (hereinafter “Plaintiff B”).

(2) After the accident of this case No. 2, the Plaintiff’s vehicle repair business operator was repaired in the 2nd accident of this case, and the Defendant paid the repair cost of KRW 1,890,368 as insurance money. 3) The main repair content of the Plaintiff’s vehicle’s vehicle repair is the exchange between the bitr, the backr, and the backr part of the fee.

C. Plaintiff D1) On June 16, 2013, the Defendant’s driver was driving the said vehicle on the road located in Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Dong-gu, Seoul on June 16, 2013, and Plaintiff D’s Nene car (hereinafter “Plaintiff D’s car”).

3) The instant accident was caused by the shocking accident (hereinafter “instant third accident”).

(2) After the third accident of this case, the Plaintiff.