1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months;

2. Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

3...

Punishment of the crime

1. The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a vehicle driving at the beginning of a spoke in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Specific Crimes and the Road Traffic Act;

On June 22, 2013, at around 05:50 on June 22, 2013, the Defendant, in front of the two-lane approach lamps, located in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Joint Zone, was driving at a speed and above three-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lane approach.

In this case, the driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle by checking well the right and the right and the right of the motor vehicle, to give notice of change of course and to prevent the accident in advance by giving notice of change of course and change of the vehicle line.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to change the lane and was driven by the victim D (year 51) who was driving in the two-lane due to the negligence of changing the lane, and received the front pent part of the front gate on the left side of the Defendant’s vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim by occupational negligence requiring approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and at the same time, did not immediately stop the damaged vehicle so that the amount equivalent to KRW 4,801,720 of the repair cost would amount to KRW 4,801,720 and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim.

2. After causing a traffic accident as described in the foregoing paragraph (1), the Defendant, who was an offender, was anticipated to have been punished for a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment, following the occurrence of the said traffic accident, and the escape was anticipated, with the intent to capture it. On June 24, 2013, the Defendant asked the F to the effect that “A driver’s license is suspended due to the failure to renew the license. It is difficult to collect the vehicle license, and if the insurance is processed only, it would be possible to call to the police station to the effect that the Defendant would have driven the vehicle.”

The defendant has consented F to this.