logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2015.04.21 2015고단281
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing car.

1. Around 04:00 on August 15, 2014, the Road Traffic Act violated (Ex Post Facto Measures) and driving the said vehicle at a speed that would not be known by three lanes of the two-lanes in the direction of the two-lane between the two-lanes in the direction of the two-lanes in the direction of the two-lanes.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to accurately operate the steering direction and brake system of his/her vehicle and to safely drive the road by ascertaining the traffic conditions and by safely examining the right and the right of the road and the right and the right of the vehicle in advance.

Nevertheless, the part on the left side of the EYF small taxi driven by the victim D due to the negligence of neglecting it and driving at the four-lanes was considered to be the part on the right side of the above rocketing vehicle of the defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant did not take necessary measures despite having suffered physical damage equivalent to KRW 746,718 of the repair amount on the damaged vehicle due to the above occupational negligence.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving) driving approximately 10km from the Dong-dong in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government to the point of the said accident under the influence of 0.212% of blood alcohol at the time and place of the accident, such as paragraph (1).

3. Where any person who violates the Automobile Management Act takes over a registered motor vehicle, he/she shall file an application for registration of transfer of ownership with the Mayor/Do Governor;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, on May 25, 2012, did not register the transfer of name without justifiable grounds, even though he/she acquired the said rocketing vehicle from F.

4. Although the defendant is prohibited from operating a motor vehicle on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, he shall not buy mandatory insurance at the same date and time and place as paragraph (1).

arrow